🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.